Skip to main content

Report from Lexology.com:

"In Lexmark International, Inc. v. Static Control Components, Inc., 134 S.Ct. 1377 (2014), the Supreme Court unanimously held that 'to invoke the Lanham Act’s cause of action for false advertising, a plaintiff must plead (and ultimately prove) an injury to a commercial interest in sales or business reputation proximately caused by the defendant’s misrepresentations
.' The Supreme Court’s holding resolved a circuit split, and broadened the ability to bring a claim for false advertising under the Lanham Act..." [Read more at lexology.com]

If you like something I've posted please feel free to click the "like" button!

Original Post

Add Reply

Post
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×